Skip to main content

THE WENGER IN OLUBADAN AND THE AJUMOBI IN ALL OF US

Contrary to what the lengthy title suggests, this won't be a long epistle neither will it be an in-depth analysis. It won't hurl insults neither will it be political. This is so because the writer is a simple teacher that won't write authoritatively on issues he knows little about. But as learners of life, can't we all learn from the impasse and the little we know of?

Is there any alikeness between Wenger and  Olubadan? Not really as Wenger heads an institution where he can be sacked any time while Olubadan, Oba Saliu Adetunji, heads a cultural normative institution, a big monarch of the biggest city in West Africa.  Wenger has failed Arsenal in a way ( even if the boards and players have their contributions too) but Olubadan is a successful monarch over a peaceful yet populated city. As spectators of history, where are the lessons from the current development in the city? Where has Wenger faltered and started fumbling? 

The urgent moral of this anecdote is that the head is (no matter how strong, knowledgeable, powerful, tactical) as weak as the weakest link in the team. Check Wenger out, the once-great tactician has fielded at least one weak link in his first eleven in the last decade of his recent inglorious struggle. This weak-link syndrome has failed many great men e.g. Achilles and his heel ( even Jesus was betrayed by a Judas) , has failed conglomerates ( think Daewoo and Kodak companies), has failed nations, etc. And remember that the impasse in the city started because some chieftains actually accepted or, as reported, pleaded for the change. Are they the weak-link or the Monarch-chieftain relationship has weakened so? 

Learn, that you are as strong as the weakest member of your team and also, the going-concern of your success as a team depends on the relationship and loyalty forged. A house divided against itself can't hold its sovereignty.

Except for the generic meaning of Ajumobi ( 'Collective parenting': I stand corrected)  what else could link us to his Excellency, Governor Ajumobi's action? Change-Agent. To effect a change successfully, one needs to consult, sell ideas, identify sub-agents that will drive the force of the change. A political change, the manner and the approach, may differ a traditional change. But for every change, change-agent factors are overtly and covertly important. Definitely most people abhor changes therefore resistance will be abound. But it behooves the initiator of the change to thoroughly convince those individuals and turn them into loyalists of the cause. How do we achieve this?

The five building blocks of a successful change according to the Prosci Adkar model, are: 
1. Awareness  
2. Desire 
3. Knowledge 
4. Ability 
5. Reinforcement 
 
AWARENESS borders on the reason(s) for the  urgency of that needed change and with the absence of collective awareness, efforts will amount to STATUS QUO. DESIRE is making it every stake holder's  personal  decision to effect the change and if this is not achieved, we have RESISTANCE. Next is the KNOWLEDGE enabling and driving  the change and if absent, we have WRONG ACTIONS. ABILITY is empowering people to act on the vision and without ability, there will be FRUSTRATION. While making a change is difficult, sustaining it can be more difficult. That's why REINFORCEMENT addresses our brains' natural tendency to revert to the usual and without reinforcement, we have RETROGRESSION. 

Are you faced with Status quo, Resistance, Wrong Actions, Frustration, or Retrogression while effecting a change at your little corner of the world? Or more than one of these at a time?  Which one has his Excellency's change faced with? Trace it back to the preceding paragraph, ADKAR will show you what's amiss.

The impasse will be resolved by the court. We ain't here to pass judgement anyway. We just learn from the obvious foible from each quarter. Wenger, his Royal Highness, his Excellency, and US, we all have a little of other-selves in ourselves. 

---toonday 
On Toonday's Perspectives

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Ise kekere, owo n la' Less Work: More pay

Actually, that idiomatic expression as often employed in our prayers " Ise kekere, owo nla" can be understood from different perspectives. This is not to decry our elders. They have given varieties of proverbs to suit needs and moments beyond what a motivational book can condensedly give. 'Ai'ni arojinle ni mu iyawo pe oko re ni were nitori pe omo re omo were ni, oun gan fun rare iyawo were ( It's only a lack deep reflection that will make a wife call her husband a mad man because as such her child is the child of a mad man and she is a wife of a mad man). The focal point is the effect this idiomatic prayer has wrought on our social mentality like the musical cliche that has also turned into another idiomatic expression: " Mi o lè wa ku, mo ti gbiyan ju, Moti se iwon ti mo lè se, alubarika alubarika nikoko" ( I can't over-exert myself.  I have given it my best shot. God's blessing is significant). That rendition always lowers determinat

True True Mark of a Champion: Both Liverpool and Manchester City Came from behind to Claim Maximum Points in their Matches

 Klopp called his boys mentality monsters and of course they are. Coming from behind three times in a week to secure victory was massive. Aston Villa got the first goal and they intended to sit on it. They pushed and held forth till like 80 minutes into the game when Robertson equalised and Mane got the most dramatic winner at the tick-tock of the last minute. They are the king of comebacks. No one does it better than Klopp guys. #AVLLIV On #MCISOU James Ward Prowse tucked a rebound from Stuart Armstrong strike to put Sothampton ahead. City heaved and puffed before they could get an equaliser. Until Kyle Walker secured a goal and later assisted Aguero for the winner. Kyle Walker, the savior. Guardiola would love to be ahead but Klopp this time would not be willing to relinquish such lead. It unfolds we follow sha! --toonday 

A Father Nonetheless

A father should be a hero: gallant, and valiant. That's relatively the social expectation of a father figure. For such structure, fatherhood extends beyond sperming an ovum.  That's our expectations. Failure on these expectations sees the society questioning the father of his moral claim on the child.  For a mother, there is the unmatchable and unquestionable nine-month sacrifice that any amount of post-birth mishap or misnomer could not erase. The pain a mother passes through during birth is beyond any bearable decibel.  Therefore the baggage of expectation is often much on the father, as the mother's nature-induced pain has compensated for anything. When a father fails, the society and the child complain. But, should that mindset be coming from the child without considering other factors? Many a father nowadays desires to be a role model but the gnawing environment saps their realities to pitiable shambles. No excuse for them though but time is hars